providerthinkingmachines /

Inkling

350 DZD in 1418 DZD out 60 DZD cached/ 1M tokens

Inkling is a general-purpose multimodal model that accepts text, image and audio inputs and generates text outputs.

Publicfp8JSON
Inkling
Capabilities
ToolsVisionReasoning
ArchitectureMoE
Context Window524K

Inkling

1. General Information

Inkling is a general-purpose multimodal model that accepts text, image, and audio inputs and generates text outputs. It is intended for use in English and other languages, and across multiple coding languages. The model is designed to be used by developers building AI-powered applications, including agentic and tool-use systems, coding assistants, chatbots, and retrieval-augmented generation systems, and is suitable for general-purpose conversational use, instruction-following, and other natural language and multimodal tasks. It is released with open weights to support research, fine-tuning, and integration into third-party products by downstream developers.

Languages: English, with general multilingual capabilities across other languages.


2. Model Properties

PropertyValue
Model typeMultimodal autoregressive transformer
Architecture typeA 66-layer decoder-only transformer with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) feed-forward backbone: each token is routed to 6 of 256 experts, plus 2 shared experts active on every token. Attention is a hybrid of local and global layers. The model is natively multimodal — images and video are encoded via a hierarchical patch encoder, and audio via discrete token encoding — with all modalities projected into a shared hidden space and processed jointly by the decoder.
Parameters975B total, 41B active
Numerics supportBF16 and NVFP4
Input modalitiesInkling accepts text input in UTF-8 encoding, image input in any pixel-based format (with each dimension ideally between 40px and 4096px for optimal performance), and audio input in WAV format sampled at 16kHz (ideally under 20 minutes in length for optimal performance)
Output modalitiesInkling generates output as UTF-8 encoded text

3. Evaluations

Inkling results are reported at effort=0.99. Comparison scores are generated Jul 14, 2026. Nemotron 3 Ultra, Kimi K2.5, Kimi K2.6, GLM 5.2, and DeepSeek V4 Pro are open weights models; Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Fable 5, and GPT 5.6 Sol are closed weights models.

Reasoning

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
HLE (text only)29.7%26.6%29.4%35.9%40.1%35.9%44.7%53.3%47.2%
HLE (with tools)46.0%37.4%50.2%54.0%54.7%48.2%51.4%64.5%55.0%
AIME 202697.1%94.2%95.8%96.4%99.2%96.7%98.3%–99.9%
GPQA Diamond87.2%86.7%87.9%91.1%89.5%88.8%94.1%92.6%94.1%

Agentic (coding)

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
SWEBench Verified77.6%70.7%76.8%80.2%–80.6%80.6%95.0%–
SWEBench Pro (Public)54.3%46.4%50.7%58.6%62.1%55.4%54.2%80.0%64.6%
Terminal Bench 2.1 (Best Harness)63.856.451.371.382.76473.884.689.5
GDPVal-AA v212331164100911901514130796217601748

Agentic (general)

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
MCP Atlas74.1%44.7%64.0%68.1%77.8%73.2%78.2%83.3%81.8%
Tau 3 Banking23.7%13.8%13.2%20.6%26.8%25.8%16.5%26.8%33.0%

Factuality

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
BrowseComp (w/ Ctx)77.1%–74.9%83.2%–83.4%85.9%88.0%89.4%
SimpleQA Verified43.9%32.4%36.9%38.7%38.1%57.0%77.3%68.3%71.6%
AA Omniscience1.0%-1.0%-8.0%6.0%4.0%-10.0%33.0%40.0%22.0%

Chat

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
IFBench79.8%81.4%70.2%76.0%73.3%76.5%77.1%63.5%72.7%
Global-MMLU-Lite88.7%85.6%84.0%88.4%89.2%89.3%92.7%93.3%91.8%

Vision

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
MMMU Pro (Standard 10)73.5%–75.0%79.0%––82.0%84.2%83.0%
Charxiv RQ78.1%–77.5%80.4%––80.2%86.5%84.7%
Charxiv RQ (with python)82.0%–78.7%86.7%––89.9%89.4%87.8%

Audio

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
Audio MC56.6%–––––66.8%––
MMAU77.2%–––––82.5%––
VoiceBench91.4%–––––94.3%––

Safety

BenchmarkInklingNemotron 3 UltraKimi K2.5Kimi K2.6GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.1 Pro (high)Claude Fable 5 (max)GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh)
FORTRESS (Adversarial)78.0%77.6%54.1%65.6%71.3%36.0%65.2%96.0%82.4%
FORTRESS (Benign)95.9%90.5%98.3%97.2%90.0%98.5%98.0%55.1%98.1%
StrongREJECT98.6%98.7%99.5%99.8%98.5%98.6%98.0%98.7%98.5%